Concord has filed its response to the FCRA petition for judicial review.
Their response attempts to steer attention to FCRA motivation rather than the quite narrow focus on the question before the Court: Would Concord suffer “unnecessary hardship” such that the City could grant them an exemption from zoning?
The response contains all kinds of information on soil remediation, various charitable causes they support, constraints around the timing of Creekside Park delivery, etc. Everything except “Hardship” – the basis of the exemption!
Have a read. You’ll enjoy it.